The highly anticipated continuation of the beloved series “Sex and the City,” titled “And Just Like That,” arrived with immense fanfare but ultimately left many viewers feeling underwhelmed. For a show that once defined a generation’s perspective on love, friendship, and fashion, its successor struggled to capture the same magic. The new series, which aimed to reflect the characters’ lives as they navigated their 50s, instead felt disjointed and out of touch with the very essence that made the original so iconic. It was a stark contrast to the witty, groundbreaking, and often raw narrative that fans had come to cherish.
A significant factor in the show’s reception was the notable absence of one of its core pillars, Samantha Jones. The strained relationship between the actresses behind Samantha and Carrie Bradshaw in real life translated into a clunky and unsatisfying storyline for their characters. Instead of giving a proper send-off to such a pivotal figure, the show relegated Samantha to off-screen text messages and vague mentions, which felt like a disrespectful dismissal of her importance to the group’s dynamic. Her absence created a noticeable void, as Samantha represented a vital source of humor, independence, and unapologetic sexuality that was sorely missed in the new installment.
Moreover, the development of the remaining three characters, Carrie, Charlotte, and Miranda, seemed contrived and lacked authenticity. Carrie, who was the central figure of the original series, lost her characteristic introspection and distinct voice. While her grief storyline had the potential to provide emotional depth, it often seemed overly dramatic and missed the detailed exploration of her inner world that her columns used to offer. Charlotte, who was initially portrayed as a delightfully neurotic traditionalist, was placed in narratives that appeared trite and shallow, failing to move her past her identity as a devoted wife and mother. Her difficulties with parenting and social matters were depicted in a way that seemed more like a collection of contemporary challenges rather than true human experiences.
Miranda’s change was likely the most surprising for loyal followers. Her evolution from a skeptical and practical attorney to what seemed like an inexperienced and awkward learner seemed like a total departure from her well-known character. The series’ effort to depict her middle-aged realization appeared exaggerated, as her unexpected romantic relationship and venture into queerness felt more like a plot convenience than an authentic exploration. This dramatic alteration in character appeared to undermine her authenticity for the benefit of a “woke” storyline, distancing viewers who valued her for her honest, straightforward demeanor.
The new characters introduced to fill the void left by Samantha and to add diversity were, for the most part, poorly integrated into the story. They often felt like tokens rather than fully developed individuals with their own lives and motivations. The show’s attempt to address contemporary social issues, such as gender identity and racial inequality, came across as heavy-handed and preachy. The dialogue surrounding these topics lacked the natural, conversational flow of the original series and instead felt like a series of educational lectures. This approach robbed the show of its authenticity and replaced its sharp wit with a self-conscious desire to be politically correct.
One of the most significant losses was the show’s iconic approach to fashion. In “Sex and the City,” fashion was a character in itself, an extension of the women’s personalities and a reflection of their emotional state. In “And Just Like That,” the fashion often felt like a costume, over-the-top and disconnected from the characters’ daily lives. While there were moments of brilliance, much of the wardrobe seemed to be a desperate attempt to capture the old magic, resulting in outfits that looked more like museum pieces than lived-in clothes. This superficial approach to style mirrored the show’s overall lack of substance.
The pacing and structure of the new series also contributed to its downfall. The narrative often jumped from one underdeveloped plot point to another, leaving no time for genuine character development or emotional resonance. The show’s short season format felt restrictive, forcing storylines to be rushed and resolutions to be unsatisfying. The original series thrived on its episodic nature, with each week offering a self-contained story that contributed to a larger narrative arc. The new format felt more like a fragmented collection of vignettes than a cohesive story, leaving audiences feeling like they were watching a highlight reel of missed opportunities.
Ultimately, the failure of “And Just Like That” can be attributed to its inability to understand what made “Sex and the City” so successful in the first place. The original show was a product of its time, a groundbreaking look at the lives of single women in New York City. Its charm lay in its honesty, its humor, and its unflinching portrayal of female friendships. The new series, by contrast, seemed to be trying too hard to be something it wasn’t, chasing after contemporary trends and social commentary without a solid foundation of character or story. It lost the authentic heart of its predecessor and, in doing so, lost its audience.
In the end, “And Just Like That” served as a disappointing reminder that some stories are best left untouched. While the nostalgia of seeing the characters return was a powerful draw, the show itself failed to deliver a narrative worthy of their legacy. It was a series that had the potential to explore the complexities of aging, loss, and change but instead opted for a superficial and uninspired approach. The result was a show that felt less like a celebration of friendship and more like a hollow imitation of a beloved classic.
